WE WRITE CUSTOM ACADEMIC PAPERS

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

ONLINE RETAIL INDUSTRY; TAX AVOIDANCE & CONTRACT ENFORCEABILITY

Direct Marketing Assn v Brohl & In re Zapposcom Inc Customer Data Sec Breach Litigation [MAIN CASES]

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Do NOT write in PARAGRAPHS.

2. Write BULLET POINTS in CLEAR & CONCISE SENTENCES.
– Do NOT use RUN-ON SENTENCES. Make it SHORT & TO THE POINT!!!

3. Make sure to read ALL the court’s opinion in its entirety. Directly quote facts from the court’s opinion. You HAVE to read the Court’s Opinion because that is where you will get most IMPORTANT information!!!

THERE ARE 4 x SECTIONS THIS ASSIGNMENT.

SECTION #1
IMPACT OF THE DECISION (1 x PAGE)
Explain HOW the following cases DIRECTLY cited Direct Marketing Assn v Brohl. and HOW the Direct Marketing Assn v Brohl. cased DIRECTLY impacted the ruling in the following cases:

Maze v Internal Revenue Service

Tonya Washington v Franchise Tax Board

EACH CASE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN SUB-SECTION!!!!

EACH CASE MUST TAKE UP HALF A PAGE!!!!

DO NOT MIX UP THESE CASES INTO ONE WHOLE SUMMARY.

MAKE A SUMMARY FOR EACH CASE

SECTION #2
One key issue is the online retail industry’s avoidance of sales tax. Read the following NY Times article (1 x PAGE)

– GIVE ME 2 x EXAMPLES (REFERENCING 2 x OTHER NEWS ARTICLES) THAT PROVES HOW THE Direct Marketing Assn v Brohl decision HAS affected Tax Avoidance issues that big online retail companies like Amazon face, versus how the Direct Marketing Assn v Brohl decision has affected “smaller” online retail industry companies. FOCUS on the difference between small and larger companies, and the Tax Avoidance issues pertaining to the ONLINE RETAIL INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE.

EACH ARTICLE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN SUB-SECTION!!!!

EACH ARTICLE MUST TAKE UP HALF A PAGE!!!!

DO NOT MIX UP THESE ARTICLES INTO ONE WHOLE SUMMARY.

MAKE A SUMMARY FOR EACH CASE

SECTION #3
IMPACT OF THE DECISION (1 x PAGE)
Explain HOW the following cases DIRECTLY cited In re Zapposcom Inc Customer Data Sec Breach Litigation and HOW the In re Zapposcom Inc Customer Data Sec Breach Litigation cased DIRECTLY impacted the ruling in the following cases:

Nicosia v Amazoncom Inc

Fagerstrom v Amazoncom Inc

EACH CASE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN SUB-SECTION!!!!

EACH CASE MUST TAKE UP HALF A PAGE!!!!

DO NOT MIX UP THESE CASES INTO ONE WHOLE SUMMARY.

MAKE A SUMMARY FOR EACH CASE

SECTION #4
Write about Contract Enforceability issues that online retail industries face – again, both big and small companies. Read the following Website links to get a little background & idea on what I want written (1 x PAGE)

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=15f5f29e-3402-4601-a8f0-a01670d14898

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Zappos.com,_Inc.,_Customer_Data_Security_Breach_Litigation

– GIVE ME 2 x EXAMPLES (REFERENCING 2 x OTHER NEWS ARTICLES) THAT PROVES HOW THE In re Zapposcom Inc Customer Data Sec Breach Litigation decision HAS affected Contract Enforceability issues that big online retail companies like Amazon face, versus how the In re Zapposcom Inc Customer Data Sec Breach Litigation decision has affected “smaller” online retail industry companies. FOCUS on the difference between small and larger companies, and the Contract Enforceability issues pertaining to the ONLINE RETAIL INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE.

EACH ARTICLE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN SUB-SECTION!!!!

EACH ARTICLE MUST TAKE UP HALF A PAGE!!!!

DO NOT MIX UP THESE ARTICLES INTO ONE WHOLE SUMMARY.

MAKE A SUMMARY FOR EACH CASE

ALL THE PAGES HAVE TO BE SINGLE-SPACED!!!!!!


Instant Quote

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!