A Re Photography Reflection As A Contribution To The Howard University Legacy
This essay examines the legacy of Howard University through the practice of re-photography. It analyzes how contemporary photographic interpretations can engage with and contribute to the historical and cultural significance of the institution. The piece discusses the theoretical underpinnings of re-photography, its application to archival materials, and its potential to foster new understandings of Howard's enduring impact. It serves as a model for students undertaking similar visual-historical research projects, demonstrating how to connect personal observation with academic inquiry.
Re-photography is a critical practice that uses contemporary images to engage with historical ones, offering new perspectives on established subjects.
A successful re-photography essay clearly articulates the thesis, the photographic process, and the interpretive goals, linking them to the historical context.
Thematic organization, focusing on specific aspects like architecture, social movements, or individuals, provides a robust structure for exploring a complex legacy.
Integrating personal reflection with academic analysis, supported by detailed descriptions of visual evidence (the photographs), strengthens the essay's argument and impact.
Assignment brief
Write a reflective essay of 1000-1500 words that uses the practice of re-photography to explore and contribute to the understanding of Howard University's legacy. Your essay should engage with at least two specific historical or cultural aspects of Howard (e.g., its role in the Civil Rights Movement, its contributions to Black arts and letters, its impact on specific academic fields, or its architectural heritage). You must include at least three original photographs that you have taken, which directly re-interpret or engage with existing historical images, sites, or themes related to Howard. Discuss your photographic process, your theoretical approach to re-photography, and how your new images offer a contemporary perspective or add to the ongoing discourse surrounding Howard's significance. Consider the ethical implications of re-interpreting historical visual material. Your essay should be well-researched, drawing on relevant academic literature concerning photography, history, and cultural studies.
Reference example
The enduring legacy of Howard University is not a static monument but a living dialogue, continually shaped by new perspectives and interpretations. For decades, its halls have fostered intellectual giants and cultural innovators, cementing its status as a beacon of Black excellence and a crucible for social change. My engagement with this legacy, through the lens of re-photography, seeks to add a contemporary visual voice to this ongoing conversation. Re-photography, as a practice, involves revisiting and re-photographing existing images or locations, often with the aim of highlighting change, continuity, or a new critical perspective. It’s an act of both homage and interrogation, allowing us to see the past through the present.
My project began with an exploration of Howard’s architectural heritage, specifically focusing on Founders Library. Completed in 1938, it stands as an iconic symbol of the university’s commitment to scholarship and intellectual pursuit. Early photographs often depict it as a pristine, imposing structure, representing aspiration and academic rigor. To re-photograph Founders, I sought not just to capture its current form but to imbue the images with a sense of its lived history and its continued relevance. My first series, "Echoes in Marble," revisits the grand staircase within the library. The original photographs, likely taken during the building’s early years, emphasize its symmetry and scale, projecting an image of ordered, authoritative knowledge. My re-photographs, however, are intentionally framed to include subtle signs of use: scuff marks on the marble steps, the worn patina of the handrails, the dappled light filtering through windows that have witnessed generations of students passing through. I used a wider aperture to soften the background, drawing the viewer’s eye to these tactile details, suggesting the human element that has shaped and animated the space over time. This approach aims to move beyond the purely monumental, acknowledging the library as a dynamic site of learning and interaction, not just an architectural artifact.
Beyond its physical structures, Howard’s legacy is inextricably linked to its pivotal role in the Civil Rights Movement. The university served as a vital hub for activism, with students organizing protests, boycotts, and sit-ins that challenged segregation and racial injustice. Archival photographs from this era often capture moments of intense struggle and collective action – students marching, picketing, or gathered in passionate debate. My second photographic series, "Shadows of the Sit-In," engages with this history. I chose to re-photograph the area around the former Woolworth’s store on 7th Street NW, a site of significant student-led sit-ins. Instead of attempting to replicate the original scenes, I focused on the contemporary urban landscape, using long exposures to create a sense of temporal displacement. The resulting images are deliberately moody, with blurred figures and lingering light, suggesting the spectral presence of past events within the present-day environment. I also incorporated elements of the existing streetscape – modern storefronts, passing cars – to emphasize the historical distance and the transformation of the physical space. This technique allows me to reflect on how the physical sites of struggle have evolved, while also prompting contemplation on the enduring impact of those actions and the ongoing fight for equality. The quietude of my images contrasts sharply with the urgency of the original events, creating a tension that I hope encourages viewers to consider what has been gained and what challenges remain.
My third series, "Portraits of Persistence," turns towards the individuals who embody Howard’s spirit. While not strictly re-photographing existing images, it engages with the tradition of portraiture that has long been central to documenting the university’s community. Early portraits often captured faculty and students in formal settings, emphasizing their academic achievements and professional stature. My approach was to capture current students in spaces that hold historical resonance – perhaps near a building named after a prominent alumnus or in a common area where significant discussions once took place. I asked students to interact naturally with their environment, allowing for candid moments. The photographs are less about formal representation and more about capturing a sense of presence and continuity. I focused on the gaze of the students, their posture, and their interaction with the university’s fabric, aiming to visually connect them to the generations that preceded them. The lighting is often natural, highlighting the textures of the campus and the individuals themselves, suggesting a direct lineage from past scholars and activists to today’s student body.
Applying re-photography to Howard’s legacy involves more than just technical execution; it requires a critical engagement with the nature of historical representation and the ethics of visual interpretation. The original photographs of Howard are powerful documents, but they are also products of their time, reflecting specific viewpoints and intentions. My re-photographs are not replacements but rather dialogues. They acknowledge the authority of the archive while asserting the validity of contemporary interpretation. By framing familiar sites and themes through a modern lens, I aim to reveal layers of meaning that might otherwise remain unseen. This practice allows for a more nuanced understanding of Howard’s legacy – one that recognizes its historical achievements while also acknowledging its ongoing evolution and its continued relevance in addressing contemporary social and intellectual challenges. The university’s story is still being written, and through practices like re-photography, we can contribute to its unfolding narrative, ensuring that its impact resonates with new generations.
Analysis of the Re-Photography Reflection Essay
This essay serves as a strong example of a reflective piece that integrates visual analysis with historical inquiry. The author uses the practice of re-photography to explore the legacy of Howard University, demonstrating how contemporary artistic methods can engage with and contribute to our understanding of historical institutions. The essay is structured around three distinct photographic series, each addressing a different facet of Howard's legacy: its architecture, its role in the Civil Rights Movement, and its student body. This thematic organization provides a clear framework for the reader.
Thesis and Claim
The central claim of the essay is that re-photography offers a valuable method for re-interpreting and contributing to the understanding of Howard University's legacy. The author argues that by revisiting historical sites and themes through a contemporary photographic lens, one can reveal new layers of meaning, acknowledge the passage of time, and connect past achievements with present realities. The thesis is implicitly stated in the introduction and consistently supported throughout the discussion of the three photographic series. The essay doesn't just describe Howard's legacy; it actively seeks to add to it through a critical visual practice.
Structure and Organization
The essay follows a logical and effective structure. It begins with an introduction that defines re-photography and establishes the essay's purpose: to engage with Howard's legacy. The body of the essay is then organized thematically around the three photographic series: 'Echoes in Marble' (architecture), 'Shadows of the Sit-In' (Civil Rights), and 'Portraits of Persistence' (students). Each section details the historical context, the photographic approach, and the intended interpretation of the new images. The author clearly explains how each series relates back to the broader theme of Howard's legacy. A concluding paragraph synthesizes the arguments and reiterates the significance of re-photography as a tool for historical reflection and contribution. This clear, thematic organization makes the essay easy to follow and allows for a focused exploration of each aspect of the topic.
Use of Evidence and Examples
The primary evidence in this essay consists of the author's own original photographs (described in detail) and their interpretations. The author also implicitly draws on historical context and the 'original photographs' they are re-interpreting, though these are not reproduced. For instance, the discussion of Founders Library references its historical depiction as a 'pristine, imposing structure,' contrasting it with the author's focus on 'scuff marks' and 'worn patina.' Similarly, the description of the Civil Rights series evokes the 'intense struggle and collective action' captured in archival images. The strength lies in the author's ability to articulate the conceptual link between the historical context and their photographic choices, explaining why they chose specific techniques (e.g., wider aperture, long exposures) to convey particular meanings.
Tone and Voice
The tone is academic, reflective, and analytical. The author adopts a scholarly voice, using precise language to discuss photographic techniques and theoretical concepts like re-photography and historical representation. There's a sense of personal engagement with the subject matter, evident in phrases like 'My engagement with this legacy...' and 'I sought not just to capture...'. However, this personal reflection is balanced with objective analysis, ensuring the essay maintains academic rigor. The voice is authoritative yet accessible, suitable for an audience interested in both visual arts and historical studies.
Revision Opportunities
While the essay is strong, potential areas for revision could include more explicit engagement with academic literature. Although the author mentions 'theoretical underpinnings' and 'academic literature concerning photography, history, and cultural studies,' the essay could be further strengthened by directly citing and discussing specific scholars or theoretical frameworks related to re-photography (e.g., John Berger on ways of seeing, or theorists discussing the ethics of image appropriation). Additionally, while the descriptions of the photographs are vivid, including the actual images (if this were a published work) would significantly enhance the reader's understanding and appreciation of the author's argument. For a student essay, ensuring all prompt requirements (like minimum word count or specific theoretical engagement) are explicitly met is crucial.
Does the essay clearly define re-photography and its relevance to the topic?
Is there a discernible thesis statement or central claim about the legacy being examined?
Is the essay logically structured, perhaps thematically or chronologically?
Are the author's photographic choices clearly explained and linked to their interpretive goals?
Does the author discuss the historical context of the original images or sites being re-photographed?
Is the tone appropriate for academic reflection (analytical, reflective, informed)?
Does the author consider the ethical implications of their work, if relevant?
Are there opportunities for the author to engage more deeply with relevant academic theory or criticism?
Does the conclusion effectively summarize the main points and reinforce the essay's contribution?
Are the descriptions of the photographs detailed enough to convey their visual impact and meaning?
Example of Integrating Theory
Instead of simply stating 'Re-photography involves revisiting and re-photographing existing images or locations,' a more theoretically grounded approach might look like this: 'Drawing on John Berger's assertion that 'the way we look at images is affected by what we know or don't know,' my practice of re-photography seeks to interrogate the historical narratives embedded within canonical images of Howard University. By revisiting the site of the 7th Street sit-ins, my long-exposure photographs aim to disrupt the singular, frozen moment often captured in archival footage, instead emphasizing the temporal palimpsest – the layering of past struggles onto the present urban fabric. This aligns with notions of hauntology, where the past is not merely absent but actively 'haunts' the present, demanding continued critical engagement.'
FAQs
What is 're-photography' in an academic context?
In academia, re-photography refers to the practice of intentionally re-photographing a specific location or subject that has been previously photographed. The goal is typically to document change over time, highlight continuity, or offer a new critical interpretation of the original image or subject. It's a method used in fields like art history, photography studies, geography, and cultural studies to analyze historical representation and societal shifts.
How can I ensure my re-photography essay contributes meaningfully to a legacy?
To contribute meaningfully, your re-photographs and accompanying analysis should offer a fresh perspective or uncover aspects of the legacy that might be overlooked in traditional historical accounts. This could involve focusing on marginalized voices, highlighting the impact of time and use on physical sites, or connecting historical events to contemporary issues. Your written analysis should clearly explain how your new images challenge, expand upon, or re-contextualize existing understandings of the legacy.
What are the ethical considerations when re-photographing historical subjects or sites?
Ethical considerations often involve respecting the original context and intent of historical images, avoiding misrepresentation, and being mindful of the cultural significance of the subject. If re-photographing sites associated with trauma or sensitive historical events, sensitivity and respectful representation are paramount. It's also important to acknowledge the source of inspiration (the original photographs or historical accounts) and to be transparent about your own interpretive framework. Avoid appropriation that disrespects or trivializes the original subject matter.
Can I use re-photography for subjects other than buildings or landscapes?
Absolutely. While buildings and landscapes are common subjects for documenting change, re-photography can be applied to almost anything that has been historically documented visually. This could include re-photographing historical portraits (perhaps using models to recreate poses or settings), re-interpreting historical event photographs by photographing the contemporary location, or even re-visiting the themes and compositions of famous artworks or documentary series. The key is the intentional act of revisiting and re-interpreting a prior visual record.