Analysis of Ariel's Character in The Tempest

This section breaks down the key analytical components of the essay on Ariel, providing insights into how the argument is constructed and supported. Understanding these elements can help students identify similar strategies in their own analytical writing.

Thesis Statement and Claim

The essay establishes a clear thesis early on: Ariel is a complex character whose defining traits—obedience, longing for freedom, and instrumental role in Prospero's plans—illuminate the play's central concerns. The essay doesn't just state Ariel is important; it claims Ariel's complexity and specific traits are crucial for understanding the play's themes of power, servitude, and autonomy. This provides a focused direction for the entire analysis.

Structure and Organization

The essay follows a logical, thematic structure. It begins with an introduction that sets up the thesis. The body paragraphs are dedicated to analyzing specific traits of Ariel: obedience, the desire for freedom, and their role in Prospero's schemes. Each trait is explored in a separate paragraph, allowing for in-depth discussion and the integration of textual evidence. The essay concludes by synthesizing these points and reinforcing the thesis, offering a comprehensive overview of Ariel's significance.

Use of Evidence

The analysis effectively integrates textual evidence to support its claims. Quotations from the play are used to illustrate Ariel's dialogue, Prospero's commands, and descriptions of Ariel's actions. For example, the essay quotes Prospero reminding Ariel of his debt ("Dost thou forget / From what a torment I did free thee?") and Ariel's pleas for liberty ("My liberty... I have no longer"). These direct references ground the analysis in the text, demonstrating how Ariel's character is developed through Shakespeare's language and dramatic action.

Tone and Voice

The essay maintains a formal, academic tone appropriate for literary analysis. The language is precise and objective, avoiding colloquialisms or overly subjective statements. The author's voice is authoritative, presenting interpretations as reasoned arguments supported by evidence. This professional tone enhances the credibility of the analysis and makes it suitable for academic submission.

Revision Opportunities and Refinements

While strong, the essay could be further enhanced by exploring the nuances of Ariel's non-human perspective more deeply. For instance, how does Ariel's ethereal nature influence their understanding of human emotions like grief or revenge? Additionally, a deeper dive into the implications of Ariel's eventual freedom could strengthen the conclusion. Does Ariel's liberation signify a broader commentary on the nature of freedom itself, or is it solely tied to Prospero's personal journey? Expanding on these points could elevate the analysis from a solid character study to a more profound thematic interpretation.

Integrating Quotations Effectively

Consider this example of integrating a quotation: Instead of simply stating, 'Ariel wants freedom,' the essay writes, 'Intertwined with their obedience is Ariel's deep-seated longing for freedom. The spirit repeatedly petitions Prospero for release, often framing their requests in terms of completed tasks or the approaching end of their service. "My liberty," Ariel implores, "I have no longer / Than time and pains shall be my follower" (1.2.248-249).' This approach introduces the quotation, provides context for it, presents the quote smoothly, and follows with analysis that explains its significance. This demonstrates how to weave textual evidence into your own argument rather than just dropping it in.

  • Does the essay have a clear thesis statement about Ariel's character?
  • Are Ariel's key traits (obedience, desire for freedom, role in plot) clearly identified and analyzed?
  • Is the analysis supported by specific textual evidence (quotations and examples from the play)?
  • Is the essay well-organized with a logical flow from introduction to conclusion?
  • Does the essay maintain a formal, academic tone?
  • Does the conclusion effectively summarize the main points and reinforce the thesis?