Analysis of the Chester Arthur Essay Example

This essay provides a detailed examination of Chester Arthur's presidency, focusing on his unexpected rise to power and his significant contributions to civil service reform. It moves beyond a superficial understanding of Arthur as merely a product of the spoils system to explore the complexities of his administration and its lasting impact. The structure is logical, beginning with an introduction that sets the stage and presents the essay's central argument, followed by body paragraphs that develop specific points with supporting historical context, and concluding with a summary of Arthur's legacy.

Thesis and Argument Development

The essay's central thesis is clearly articulated in the introduction: 'Chester Arthur’s presidency remains one of the more curious chapters in American history, a tenure defined by an unexpected ascent and a surprising commitment to reform.' The argument unfolds by contrasting Arthur's reputation as a spoilsman with his actual reformist actions, particularly his role in passing the Pendleton Act. The essay effectively argues that Arthur was more than just a placeholder president; he was a transformative figure who initiated crucial changes in public administration. This thesis is consistently supported throughout the text, with each paragraph building upon the core idea by providing historical context, specific examples, and analysis of Arthur's decisions and their consequences.

Structure and Organization

The essay follows a traditional academic structure, ensuring a clear and coherent flow of ideas. It begins with an introduction that establishes the context and thesis. The body paragraphs are organized thematically, dedicating distinct sections to Arthur's background and reputation, the impact of Garfield's assassination, the Pendleton Act, and other policy areas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of Arthur's presidency, using topic sentences to guide the reader. Transitions between paragraphs are smooth, linking the discussion of one point to the next. For instance, the paragraph discussing Arthur's background naturally leads into the discussion of how his reputation shaped perceptions of his presidency after Garfield's death. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the significance of Arthur's contributions, offering a final reflection on his legacy.

Evidence and Historical Context

The essay draws on historical context to support its claims. It references the 'spoils system,' the 'patronage network,' and the 'Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883' as key elements of the political landscape. Specific details, such as Arthur's role as Collector of the Port of New York and the famous quote from The New York Sun, add credibility and depth. The essay situates Arthur's actions within the broader post-Civil War political climate, noting the 'factionalism' and the 'growing awareness of the inefficiencies and corruption inherent in the spoils system.' This contextualization helps the reader understand the pressures Arthur faced and the significance of his reformist actions. While specific citations are absent in this example format, a full academic essay would require them to substantiate these historical claims.

Tone and Style

The tone of the essay is formal, objective, and analytical, appropriate for an academic audience. It avoids overly emotional language and maintains a balanced perspective, acknowledging both Arthur's background and his reformist achievements. The language is precise, using terms like 'improbable journey,' 'substantive reforms,' 'pervasive influence,' and 'fundamental reorientation' to convey complex ideas effectively. Sentence structure varies, incorporating both shorter, impactful sentences and longer, more complex ones to maintain reader engagement. The use of contractions is avoided, adhering to standard academic writing conventions.

Revision Opportunities

  • Strengthening the Introduction: While the thesis is clear, the introduction could be expanded to provide a slightly broader overview of the political era Arthur inherited, further establishing the 'unexpected' nature of his reforms.
  • Incorporating Direct Quotations: To enhance the essay's persuasive power, including direct quotes from historical figures, contemporary newspapers, or Arthur himself (if available and relevant) could provide stronger evidence.
  • Deeper Analysis of Opposition: The essay mentions 'congressional opposition' and 'party stalwarts.' A deeper dive into specific instances of opposition and how Arthur navigated them would add further analytical depth.
  • Comparative Analysis: Briefly comparing Arthur's approach to civil service reform with that of his predecessors or successors could highlight his unique contributions more vividly.
  • Citation: As noted, a real academic essay would require comprehensive citations (footnotes or endnotes) to support all factual claims and interpretations.
Example of a Revision: Adding Specificity

Original sentence: 'His administration also addressed other pressing issues.' Revised sentence: 'Beyond civil service reform, Arthur’s administration also prioritized the modernization of the U.S. Navy, initiating shipbuilding programs that would prove crucial in an era of burgeoning global maritime competition, and grappled with the contentious issue of tariff reform, though significant legislative progress was hampered by entrenched congressional opposition.'