Analysis of 'Daisy vs. Myrtle in The Great Gatsby'

This essay provides a comparative analysis of Daisy Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson from F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby. It aims to explore how their differing social classes, their relationships with Tom Buchanan, and their individual aspirations contribute to Fitzgerald's broader critique of the American Dream and the societal structures of the 1920s.

Thesis and Claim

The central thesis of this essay is that while Daisy Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson occupy vastly different positions within the social hierarchy of The Great Gatsby, both women ultimately serve as tragic figures, trapped by societal expectations and the destructive influence of wealth and class. Their contrasting experiences highlight Fitzgerald's disillusionment with the American Dream, suggesting it is an unattainable illusion for those outside the established elite.

Structure and Organization

The essay adopts a comparative structure, beginning with an introduction that sets the context and states the thesis. The subsequent body paragraphs are organized thematically, dedicating separate sections to analyzing Daisy's character and circumstances, followed by Myrtle's. Crucially, the essay then dedicates paragraphs to examining their shared connection through Tom Buchanan and their collective experiences as victims of societal forces. This comparative approach allows for direct juxtaposition and contrasts. The conclusion summarizes the main points and reiterates the essay's argument regarding Fitzgerald's critique of the American Dream.

Evidence and Support

The analysis draws upon specific textual details and character descriptions from The Great Gatsby. Examples include the description of Daisy's voice as 'full of money,' Myrtle's transformation in her New York apartment, and the contrasting settings of East Egg and the valley of ashes. The essay also references key symbols, such as the green light, and character actions, like Daisy's driving of Gatsby's car, to support its claims about their motivations and fates. The discussion of Tom's character and his treatment of both women provides further evidence for the argument about societal power dynamics.

Tone and Style

The essay maintains a formal, academic tone appropriate for literary analysis. The language is precise and analytical, avoiding overly emotional or subjective statements. Sentence structure varies to create a natural flow, and transitions between ideas are smooth. The author uses discipline-specific vocabulary related to literary criticism (e.g., 'critique,' 'symbol,' 'social hierarchy,' 'disillusionment,' 'stratification') to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the text and its themes.

Revision Opportunities

While this essay presents a strong comparative analysis, potential areas for revision could include further exploration of the symbolic significance of the setting for each character. For instance, a deeper dive into the 'valley of ashes' as a representation of industrial decay and its specific impact on Myrtle's psyche could strengthen the argument. Additionally, while the essay touches upon Gatsby's role, a more explicit comparison of his idealized vision of Daisy versus Tom's possessive reality could add another layer to the analysis. Finally, expanding on the specific ways Fitzgerald uses each character to critique different facets of the American Dream (e.g., Daisy's critique of inherited wealth vs. Myrtle's critique of aspirational poverty) could provide even greater depth.

  • Clearly identify the characters being compared and contrasted.
  • Establish a central thesis that guides the comparison.
  • Dedicate separate sections to analyze each character individually before direct comparison.
  • Use specific textual evidence (quotes, descriptions, actions) to support claims.
  • Analyze characters' motivations, backgrounds, and relationships.
  • Discuss how characters represent broader themes or societal issues.
  • Maintain a consistent and appropriate academic tone.
  • Ensure smooth transitions between points of comparison and contrast.
  • Conclude by summarizing the main arguments and reinforcing the thesis.
Example of Character Contrast in Action

Consider the contrasting descriptions of their living spaces. Daisy resides in a 'cheerful red-and-white Georgian Colonial mansion' in East Egg, a symbol of established wealth and social grace. Her rooms are filled with 'blue gardens' and 'white dresses,' evoking an atmosphere of refined, almost ethereal, beauty. This contrasts sharply with Myrtle's cramped apartment above George's garage in the valley of ashes. Her space is described as 'small,' and her attempts to decorate it with 'a rug and a leather couch' and 'a picture of herself' are attempts to impose a superficial glamour that feels out of place and ultimately garish. This spatial contrast visually reinforces the vast economic and social chasm between them, highlighting Myrtle's aspirational but ultimately futile attempts to mimic Daisy's world.