Understanding Defamiliarization in Literature

Defamiliarization, a concept most famously articulated by Viktor Shklovsky, is a core technique in literary analysis and creative writing. It refers to the artistic method of presenting common objects, experiences, or ideas in such a way that they appear new, strange, or unfamiliar to the audience. The goal is to disrupt habitual perception, which Shklovsky believed dulled our senses and prevented us from truly seeing or appreciating the world. By making the familiar strange, writers can encourage readers to look beyond surface-level understanding, to question assumptions, and to engage with their subject matter more critically and thoughtfully. This essay example demonstrates how Shirley Jackson's 'The Lottery' effectively employs defamiliarization to expose the horror lurking beneath a seemingly ordinary social ritual.

Analysis of the Essay Example

This essay provides a strong model for analyzing defamiliarization. It moves logically from defining the concept to applying it to a specific text, then dissecting the techniques used and their impact. The analysis is grounded in close reading and specific examples from Shirley Jackson's 'The Lottery'.

Thesis and Claim

The essay's central claim is that Shirley Jackson's 'The Lottery' effectively uses defamiliarization to disrupt the reader's perception of a common social ritual, revealing its underlying horror. The thesis is clearly stated in the introduction and consistently supported throughout the body paragraphs. It's a focused claim that allows for in-depth analysis of the chosen text and concept.

Structure and Organization

The essay follows a standard, effective structure: 1. Introduction: Introduces the concept of defamiliarization and its theorist (Shklovsky), then presents the essay's thesis, identifying 'The Lottery' as the case study. 2. Body Paragraphs: Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of how Jackson achieves defamiliarization. The first body paragraph sets the scene, detailing the initial normalcy. Subsequent paragraphs delve into narrative tone, descriptive details, dialogue, and the transformation of ordinary objects (stones) into instruments of horror. The organization moves from establishing the familiar to revealing the strange and horrific. 3. Conclusion: Summarizes the main points and reiterates the impact of defamiliarization, connecting the story's themes back to the broader concept and encouraging reader reflection.

Use of Evidence

The essay effectively uses evidence from 'The Lottery.' It quotes or references specific elements like the 'black box,' the 'sunny June morning,' the children gathering 'stones,' and Tessie Hutchinson's protests. Crucially, it doesn't just present these elements but analyzes how they contribute to defamiliarization. For instance, the description of the 'splintered and faded' box highlights the decay of the tradition, while the children's stones transform from innocent objects to tools of violence. This close reading demonstrates a strong grasp of textual evidence.

Tone and Style

The tone is academic and analytical, suitable for a literary essay. It maintains a serious and thoughtful approach to the subject matter. Sentence structure varies, avoiding monotony. The language is precise, using terms like 'ubiquity,' 'automaticity,' 'perceptual blindness,' and 'rote adherence' appropriately. The essay avoids overly casual language or unsubstantiated claims, presenting a reasoned argument.

Revision Opportunities

While strong, the essay could be enhanced with a few revisions: Deeper Dive into Shklovsky: Briefly explaining why* Shklovsky believed habituation was a problem (e.g., it diminishes aesthetic experience, leads to moral complacency) could strengthen the theoretical foundation. More Explicit Connections: While connections are made, explicitly stating how each identified technique (tone, detail, dialogue) directly makes the familiar strange* could add clarity. For example, 'The mundane dialogue about crops, juxtaposed with the lottery's purpose, defamiliarizes the event by highlighting the villagers' detached performance of a horrific act.' * Broader Implications: The conclusion touches on broader implications. Expanding this slightly to consider other texts or real-world phenomena where defamiliarization might be relevant could offer a more expansive perspective, though this risks diluting the focus on Jackson's story.

  • Does the essay clearly define defamiliarization?
  • Is the chosen literary work appropriate for demonstrating the concept?
  • Are specific examples from the text used to support the analysis?
  • Does the essay explain how the literary techniques create the effect of strangeness?
  • Is the thesis statement clear and consistently supported?
  • Is the essay well-organized with a logical flow?
  • Does the conclusion effectively summarize the argument and its significance?
  • Is the tone academic and the language precise?
Applying Defamiliarization to a Different Text

Consider the opening of Kafka's 'The Metamorphosis.' Gregor Samsa wakes up to find himself transformed into a monstrous insect. This is an immediate act of defamiliarization. The 'familiar' is the human body and the experience of waking up. Kafka makes this utterly strange by replacing the human form with that of an insect. The subsequent narrative doesn't dwell on the shock of the transformation itself but on Gregor's pragmatic concerns: his job, his family's finances, his discomfort. This focus on the mundane within the utterly bizarre is key. The 'familiar' human anxieties are now attached to an 'unfamiliar' insect body, forcing the reader to confront the absurdity and alienation inherent in modern life in a way that a straightforward depiction of human anxiety might not achieve. The horror isn't just the transformation; it's the continued, albeit altered, existence and the societal reaction to it.