Analysis of Heroism in John Updike's 'A&P'

John Updike's 'A&P' is a quintessential American short story, celebrated for its sharp portrayal of adolescent disillusionment and social commentary. At its heart lies the impulsive act of Sammy, the young A&P stock boy, who quits his job in a dramatic show of defiance against the store manager, Lengel. While this act is often interpreted as a moment of heroic rebellion against petty authority and stifling conformity, a closer reading reveals a more complex and perhaps less straightforwardly heroic motivation. This analysis delves into the nuances of Sammy's decision, examining his internal monologue, his perceptions of authority and social dynamics, and the ultimate ambiguity of his gesture. Updike masterfully uses Sammy's voice to explore themes of individualism, rebellion, and the often-unclear line between genuine principle and adolescent posturing.

Thesis and Argument

The central argument is that Sammy's decision to quit his job in 'A&P,' while presented as a defiant act of heroism, is ultimately a complex gesture driven by a confluence of adolescent romanticism, a desire for self-definition against perceived societal constraints, and a performative impulse, rather than a purely selfless or deeply considered moral stand. The story suggests that true heroism is not necessarily found in impulsive rebellion but in a more nuanced understanding of consequence and principle.

Structure and Organization

The story follows a linear, chronological structure, unfolding over the course of a single afternoon. Updike meticulously builds tension through Sammy's internal observations and his escalating conflict with Lengel. The narrative is driven by Sammy's first-person perspective, allowing readers intimate access to his thoughts, judgments, and evolving emotional state. The organization can be broadly divided into three parts: the initial introduction to the setting and characters, the central conflict involving the girls and Lengel, and Sammy's climactic decision and its immediate aftermath. This structure effectively mirrors the arc of a youthful, impulsive decision: build-up, confrontation, and consequence, albeit a consequence that is more emotional and psychological than practical.

Sammy's Voice and Perspective

Sammy's narration is the engine of the story. His voice is characterized by a cynical, observant, and often judgmental tone. He uses vivid, sometimes sarcastic language to describe the shoppers, the store environment, and Lengel. This voice is crucial because it reveals his internal world – his insecurities, his romantic notions, and his deep-seated dissatisfaction with his current circumstances. His categorization of the shoppers, particularly the three girls, highlights his preoccupation with social dynamics and his desire to distinguish himself from the 'sheep' he perceives around him. His fascination with the girls stems from their perceived freedom and their disregard for the mundane rules of the A&P, making them symbols of an idealized world he wishes to inhabit or protect. This subjective narration shapes our understanding of the events, leading us to question whether his perception of Lengel's actions as unjust is entirely objective.

The Nature of Sammy's 'Heroism'

Sammy frames his decision to quit as an act of heroism, a noble stand against the oppressive conformity represented by Lengel. He imagines himself as a knight defending the 'Queen' and her companions, a romantic ideal that fuels his impulsivity. The 'good clean shock of pure shock' he feels suggests a visceral, almost exhilarating response to the opportunity for defiance. He sees his resignation as a powerful statement, a rejection of the 'policy' and the 'rules' that govern his life. However, Updike subtly complicates this heroic interpretation. Sammy's motivations are not purely altruistic; they are deeply intertwined with his adolescent crush on the 'Queen' and his desire to impress her. His act is also performative, a bid for recognition and admiration. The story suggests that his 'heroism' is a projection, a self-constructed narrative of rebellion that masks underlying insecurities and a lack of mature judgment. The true nature of his act lies in its impulsivity and its romanticized conception of defiance, rather than in a deeply considered moral imperative.

The Role of Lengel and Authority

Lengel serves as the primary antagonist and the embodiment of conventional authority and morality. His reprimand of the girls for their attire is presented by Sammy as an act of petty tyranny. Lengel, a former classmate of Sammy's mother, represents the established social order and its unwritten rules. He embodies a pragmatic, perhaps even well-intentioned, adherence to norms. His dialogue, particularly his final words to Sammy, "Sammy, you don't have to do this to yourself," reveals a more complex character than Sammy initially perceives. Lengel's response is not one of anger or triumph, but of pragmatic concern, highlighting the gap between Sammy's dramatic interpretation and the more mundane reality of the situation. Lengel's presence forces Sammy to confront the limitations of his romanticized rebellion and the practical implications of challenging authority.

Consequences and Ambiguity

The story's conclusion is marked by a profound sense of ambiguity and dawning realization for Sammy. His triumphant exit is immediately undercut by the stark reality of his isolation and the loss of his job. The 'stores' of his imagination are 'empty,' and the girls, the object of his heroic gesture, are gone. Lengel's practical advice, "But my stores were empty," resonates with Sammy’s own internal emptiness. He admits, "I hadn’t expected to be so alone." This moment of solitude forces him to confront the gap between his romanticized vision of rebellion and the practical consequences of his actions. The story doesn't offer a clear resolution or a definitive judgment on Sammy's act. Instead, it leaves the reader contemplating the nature of heroism, the complexities of adolescent idealism, and the often-unforeseen outcomes of impulsive decisions. The ambiguity lies in whether Sammy has truly gained insight or simply experienced a harsh lesson in the realities of adult life.

Revision Opportunities

  • Strengthening the Thesis: While the current thesis is clear, it could be further refined to explicitly state why Sammy's act is not conventionally heroic (e.g., lack of foresight, self-serving elements, performative nature).
  • Deeper Character Analysis: Expand on the psychological underpinnings of Sammy's behavior. Explore his adolescent anxieties and his need for validation more thoroughly, using specific textual evidence.
  • Contextualization: Briefly discuss the cultural context of the early 1960s and how societal expectations for young men might inform Sammy's desire for rebellion or conformity.
  • Comparative Analysis: If appropriate for the assignment, consider briefly comparing Sammy's 'heroism' to other literary characters who exhibit similar or contrasting forms of rebellion.
  • Refining Language: Ensure consistent use of academic vocabulary. Avoid overly casual phrasing and ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs. For instance, instead of 'Sammy sees himself as,' use 'Sammy perceives himself as' or 'Sammy constructs an image of himself as.'

Checklist for Analyzing 'A&P'

  • Identify the narrator's voice and tone: How does Sammy's narration shape our understanding of events?
  • Analyze Sammy's motivations: What drives his decision to quit? Is it principle, impulse, or something else?
  • Examine the role of authority figures: How does Lengel represent authority, and how does Sammy react to him?
  • Evaluate the 'heroic' act: Does Sammy's resignation truly qualify as heroic? What are the arguments for and against this interpretation?
  • Consider the story's ending: What is the significance of Sammy's isolation and his dawning realization?
  • Explore thematic elements: What broader themes (conformity, individualism, social critique) does the story address through Sammy's experience?
  • Use specific textual evidence: Support all claims with direct quotes or precise references to the story.
Example Paragraph: Sammy's Romanticism

Sammy’s internal monologue frequently veers into romanticized territory, particularly when he imagines his own actions. He doesn't just quit; he envisions a dramatic exit, a 'good clean shock of pure shock,' that will somehow register with the 'Queen.' This self-dramatization is evident when he thinks, 'I could feel my stomach giving a lurch... I could see myself already quitting this house.' The language here, 'lurch,' 'quitting this house,' evokes a sense of grand, almost theatrical, departure. He is not merely leaving a job; he is enacting a scene, casting himself as the protagonist in a narrative of rebellion. This tendency to frame his mundane reality through the lens of adolescent fantasy is key to understanding why his act, while defiant, falls short of genuine, considered heroism. His focus is less on the principle of the matter and more on the potential impact of his gesture on his perceived audience, the girls.